Goodman v Faber Prest Steel
The trial judge failed to adequately test Mr. Goodman’s oral evidence of immediate pain against documentary evidence, including medical records and his own email, which contradicted his account. The judge’s reliance on witness performance without addressing contradictory documents was a material error.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Michael Goodman; Defendant/appellant: Faber Prest Steel
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; case remitted for re-hearing before a different judge.
- Legal Topics
- Damages Assessment, Contributory Negligence, Credibility of Witness, Medical Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Goodman
Claimant/respondent
Faber Prest Steel
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Goodman suffered significant injury as a result of the accident
- 2 Whether the judge properly assessed the credibility of Mr. Goodman’s evidence in light of documentary evidence
- 3 Whether damages were properly awarded based on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge failed to adequately test Mr. Goodman’s oral evidence of immediate pain against documentary evidence, including medical records and his own email, which contradicted his account. The judge’s reliance on witness performance without addressing contradictory documents was a material error.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; case remitted for re-hearing before a different judge.
Orders
- Judge’s order awarding damages to Mr. Goodman set aside.
- Matter remitted for re-hearing before a different judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment