Goodman v Faber Prest Steel

Goodman v Faber Prest Steel

The trial judge failed to adequately test Mr. Goodman’s oral evidence of immediate pain against documentary evidence, including medical records and his own email, which contradicted his account. The judge’s reliance on witness performance without addressing contradictory documents was a material error.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Michael Goodman; Defendant/appellant: Faber Prest Steel
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; case remitted for re-hearing before a different judge.
Legal Topics
Damages Assessment, Contributory Negligence, Credibility of Witness, Medical Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Goodman

Claimant/respondent

Faber Prest Steel

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Appeal From County Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Goodman suffered significant injury as a result of the accident
  2. 2 Whether the judge properly assessed the credibility of Mr. Goodman’s evidence in light of documentary evidence
  3. 3 Whether damages were properly awarded based on the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge failed to adequately test Mr. Goodman’s oral evidence of immediate pain against documentary evidence, including medical records and his own email, which contradicted his account. The judge’s reliance on witness performance without addressing contradictory documents was a material error.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment set aside; case remitted for re-hearing before a different judge.

Orders

  • Judge’s order awarding damages to Mr. Goodman set aside.
  • Matter remitted for re-hearing before a different judge.