Parabola Investments Ltd & Ors v Browallia Cal Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 486 (05 May 2010)
Damages for loss of profits after discovery of fraud are recoverable in deceit where the fraud has a continuing effect on the claimant's ability to generate profits, and the assessment of such damages is not precluded by the discovery of the fraud; the trial judge's approach to quantifying lost profits was rational...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Civ 486
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Parabola Investments Limited; Claimant/respondent: Aria Investments Limited (formerly Tangent Investments Limited); Defendant/appellant: Browallia Cal Limited (formerly Union Cal Limited); Defendant/appellant: MF Global UK Limited (formerly Man Financial Limited); Defendant/appellant: Matthew Bomford
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Commercial Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Deceit, Fraud, Loss of Profits, Assessment of Damages, Remoteness of Damage
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parabola Investments Limited
Claimant/respondent
Aria Investments Limited (formerly Tangent Investments Limited)
Claimant/respondent
Browallia Cal Limited (formerly Union Cal Limited)
Defendant/appellant
MF Global UK Limited (formerly Man Financial Limited)
Defendant/appellant
Matthew Bomford
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Commercial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether damages for loss of profits after discovery of fraud are recoverable in deceit
- 2 Whether the assessment of lost profits was too speculative to be recoverable
- 3 Whether the discovery of fraud is a legal cut-off for recoverable damages
Ratio Decidendi
Damages for loss of profits after discovery of fraud are recoverable in deceit where the fraud has a continuing effect on the claimant's ability to generate profits, and the assessment of such damages is not precluded by the discovery of the fraud; the trial judge's approach to quantifying lost profits was rational and supported by evidence, and the compensatory principle requires restoration of the claimant to the position they would have been in but for the fraud.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal on quantification refused
- Judgment of Flaux J affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment