Kayleigh Dawson, R (on the application of) v Crown Court Sitting at Preston

Kayleigh Dawson, R (on the application of) v Crown Court Sitting at Preston

The Crown Court correctly applied the statutory test for destruction orders under the Dangerous Dogs Act, considered all relevant evidence and circumstances, and was justified in finding that Lightning constituted a danger to public safety; there was no error of law or public law warranting intervention.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Kayleigh Dawson; Defendant/respondent: Crown Court Sitting at Preston; First Interested Party: Chief Constable of Lancashire Police; Second Interested Party: Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Dangerous Dogs Act, Destruction Orders, Contingent Destruction Orders, Judicial Review, Standard of Proof, Fit and Proper Person, Statutory Interpretation
Administrative Law Criminal Law Animal Law Dangerous Dogs Act Destruction Orders Contingent Destruction Orders Judicial Review Standard of Proof +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kayleigh Dawson

Claimant/appellant

Crown Court Sitting at Preston

Defendant/respondent

Chief Constable of Lancashire Police

First Interested Party

Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Second Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Crown Court applied an incorrect standard in determining if Lightning constituted a danger to public safety
  2. 2 Whether the Crown Court failed to consider relevant circumstances including future precautions and conditions of a contingent destruction order
  3. 3 Whether the Crown Court erred in fact regarding Lightning's behaviour

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown Court correctly applied the statutory test for destruction orders under the Dangerous Dogs Act, considered all relevant evidence and circumstances, and was justified in finding that Lightning constituted a danger to public safety; there was no error of law or public law warranting intervention.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No error of law found in Crown Court or High Court decisions
  • Destruction order for Lightning upheld