WWRT Limited v Serhiy Tyshchenko & Anor.
WWRT failed to establish that Mrs Tyshchenko's breaches were serious, deliberate, or material to the enforcement of a judgment. Most breaches were minor, technical, or excusable, and there was no evidence of substantial assets being concealed or of conduct justifying debarring or an unless order. The court found Mrs Tyshchenko had made genuine efforts to comply, and any failures did not warrant the sanctions sought.
- Parties
- Claimant: WWRT Limited; First Defendant: Serhiy Tyshchenko; Second Defendant: Olena Tyshchenko
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Debarring Order or Unless Order
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Debarring Orders, Unless Orders, Freezing Orders, Disclosure Obligations, Bankruptcy Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WWRT Limited
Claimant
Serhiy Tyshchenko
First Defendant
Olena Tyshchenko
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Debarring Order or Unless Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Tyshchenko should be debarred from defending the claim for alleged breaches of freezing and disclosure orders
- 2 Whether an unless order should be issued as an alternative to debarring
- 3 Whether the breaches alleged justify the sanctions sought
Ratio Decidendi
WWRT failed to establish that Mrs Tyshchenko's breaches were serious, deliberate, or material to the enforcement of a judgment. Most breaches were minor, technical, or excusable, and there was no evidence of substantial assets being concealed or of conduct justifying debarring or an unless order. The court found Mrs Tyshchenko had made genuine efforts to comply, and any failures did not warrant the sanctions sought.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- WWRT's application for a debarring order or unless order is dismissed.
- Further submissions invited on revision of the freezing and cross-examination orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment