Nationwide Building Society v Dunlop Haywards Ltd & Anor
The court found that DH, through Mr McGarry, made false and material representations in the valuation reports, was at least reckless as to their truth, intended Nationwide to rely on them, and Nationwide did so, suffering loss. The evidence established that the reports were not based on genuine inspections or honest valuations but were 'desk-top' valuations based on fictitious leases. The court was satisfied that DH had no real prospect of defending the claim and that summary judgment was appropriate.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nationwide Building Society; First Defendant: Dunlop Haywards Limited; Second Defendant: Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial Fraud/deceit) / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for the claimant (Nationwide) against DHL (Adderley Road and Carmarthen) and Limited (Oldbury), damages to be assessed. Case settled before final judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Deceit, Fraud, Vicarious Liability, Summary Judgment, Valuation Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nationwide Building Society
Claimant
Dunlop Haywards Limited
First Defendant
Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial Fraud/deceit) / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants (DH) are liable in deceit for fraudulent property valuations relied upon by the claimant (Nationwide)
- 2 Whether summary judgment is appropriate in a case involving allegations of fraud and dishonesty
- 3 Whether the representations made by DH were false, material, and induced the claimant's loss
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that DH, through Mr McGarry, made false and material representations in the valuation reports, was at least reckless as to their truth, intended Nationwide to rely on them, and Nationwide did so, suffering loss. The evidence established that the reports were not based on genuine inspections or honest valuations but were 'desk-top' valuations based on fictitious leases. The court was satisfied that DH had no real prospect of defending the claim and that summary judgment was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for the claimant (Nationwide) against DHL (Adderley Road and Carmarthen) and Limited (Oldbury), damages to be assessed. Case settled before final judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment