Kinch v Rosling & Ors
The claimant is entitled to recover all special damages directly caused by the deceit, including payments made, lost investments, professional fees, and consequential losses, as well as general damages for distress and anxiety. Interest is awarded at 8% up to 17 August 2008 and 10% thereafter, in line with Part 36.14.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gilbert Kenneth Kinch; First Defendant: David Rosling; Second Defendant: Gillian Locke; Third Defendant: Kim Rosling
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Deceit (fraud) / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant against the first defendant. Damages assessed and awarded as specified. Proceedings remain on foot against the second and third defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Deceit, Fraud, Damages, Bankruptcy, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gilbert Kenneth Kinch
Claimant
David Rosling
First Defendant
Gillian Locke
Second Defendant
Kim Rosling
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Deceit (fraud) / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for deceit committed by the first defendant?
- 2 Are consequential losses, including those not reasonably foreseeable, recoverable in this case?
- 3 Is the claimant entitled to general damages for distress and anxiety caused by the deceit and resulting bankruptcy?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to recover all special damages directly caused by the deceit, including payments made, lost investments, professional fees, and consequential losses, as well as general damages for distress and anxiety. Interest is awarded at 8% up to 17 August 2008 and 10% thereafter, in line with Part 36.14.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant against the first defendant. Damages assessed and awarded as specified. Proceedings remain on foot against the second and third defendants.
Orders
- First defendant to pay special damages and interest as set out in the judgment schedule.
- First defendant to pay general damages of £10,000 for distress and anxiety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment