Petromec Inc v Petroleo Brasiliero SA Petrobras & Anor

Petromec Inc v Petroleo Brasiliero SA Petrobras & Anor

Petromec failed to prove that Petrobras made any false or fraudulent representations in the October 1999 letters. The letters accurately reflected the status of the global payment proposal, which remained on the Executive Board agenda and had not been rejected or shelved. Petromec did not rely on the letters in allowing the Platform to depart, and even if it had, it would not have succeeded in securing a more favourable agreement. No recoverable loss was established. The alternative claim for negligent misstatement also failed for want of misrepresentation, reliance, and loss.

Parties
Claimant: Petromec Inc; First Defendant: Petroleo Brasiliero SA Petrobras; Second Defendant: Braspetro Oil Services Company (Brasoil)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Trial (fraud/misrepresentation) / Final Judgment After Second Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Deceit (fraudulent Misrepresentation), Negligent Misstatement, Contractual Interpretation, Corporate Authority, Damages
Commercial Law Contract Law Tort Law Deceit (fraudulent Misrepresentation) Negligent Misstatement Contractual Interpretation Corporate Authority Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petromec Inc

Claimant

Petroleo Brasiliero SA Petrobras

First Defendant

Braspetro Oil Services Company (Brasoil)

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Trial (fraud/misrepresentation) / Final Judgment After Second Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Petrobras made fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations to Petromec in October 1999 regarding the likelihood of a global payment agreement being approved by its Executive Board.
  2. 2 Whether Petromec relied on those representations to its detriment, and if so, whether it suffered recoverable loss.

Ratio Decidendi

Petromec failed to prove that Petrobras made any false or fraudulent representations in the October 1999 letters. The letters accurately reflected the status of the global payment proposal, which remained on the Executive Board agenda and had not been rejected or shelved. Petromec did not rely on the letters in allowing the Platform to depart, and even if it had, it would not have succeeded in securing a more favourable agreement. No recoverable loss was established. The alternative claim for negligent misstatement also failed for want of misrepresentation, reliance, and loss.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed