Osborne & Anor v Cambrigeshire County Council [2022] EWHC 1982 (Admin) (25 July 2022)
Ms Osborne was and is the legal parent of C as a matter of fact and law; the Registrar's refusal to register her as parent was a fundamental error of law, leading to an unnecessary and irregular adoption order. The adoption order was a legal aberration and must be revoked. Judicial review is granted to quash the Registrar's decision and enable a fresh, correct registration. Relief is necessary to restore the family to the position they should have been in but for the unlawful decision.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1982 (Admin)
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Sarah Osborne; Respondent/claimant: Helen Arnold; First Intervener/defendant: Cambridgeshire County Council; Second Intervener/interested Party: The Registrar General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Family and Administrative Court Proceedings (declaration of Parentage, Revocation of Adoption, Judicial Review) / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration of parentage granted; adoption order revoked; judicial review granted; Registrar's decision quashed; costs ordered against Cambridgeshire County Council.
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Parentage, Revocation of Adoption Order, Birth Registration, Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Judicial Review of Registrar's Decision, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Osborne
Applicant/claimant
Helen Arnold
Respondent/claimant
Cambridgeshire County Council
First Intervener/defendant
The Registrar General
Second Intervener/interested Party
Procedural Posture
Family and Administrative Court Proceedings (declaration of Parentage, Revocation of Adoption, Judicial Review) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a declaration of parentage should be made in favour of Ms Osborne under s.55A Family Law Act 1986
- 2 Whether the adoption order made in 2015 should be revoked under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court
- 3 Whether the Registrar's refusal to register Ms Osborne as parent was unlawful and should be quashed by judicial review
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Osborne was and is the legal parent of C as a matter of fact and law; the Registrar's refusal to register her as parent was a fundamental error of law, leading to an unnecessary and irregular adoption order. The adoption order was a legal aberration and must be revoked. Judicial review is granted to quash the Registrar's decision and enable a fresh, correct registration. Relief is necessary to restore the family to the position they should have been in but for the unlawful decision.
Court Disposition
Declaration of parentage granted; adoption order revoked; judicial review granted; Registrar's decision quashed; costs ordered against Cambridgeshire County Council.
Orders
- Declaration of parentage in favour of Ms Osborne under s.55A Family Law Act 1986
- Revocation of adoption order made in respect of C by the Family Court sitting at Ipswich on 3 November 2015
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment