Ferand Business Corporation & Ors v Maritime Investments Holdings Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 40 (Comm) (29 January 2021)
The court held that the service of the Extra Judicial Notices in Greece did not constitute a breach of the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Stockholder Agreement, as they did not amount to formal legal proceedings. The court further found that the claimants had provided all required financial statements and information to the defendants as required by the Stockholder Agreement, and that the defendants were not entitled to further information or to make the demands set out in the EJNs. The court refused to grant general or tendentious declarations but granted specific declarations confirming compliance with the agreement and the lack of entitlement to further demands.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 40 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ferand Business Corporation; Claimant: Angeliki Frangou; Claimant: Maritime Enterprises Management S.A.; First Defendant/additional Claimant: Maritime Investments Holdings Limited; Second Defendant/additional Defendant: Kolen International S.A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim for Declaratory Relief / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Declarations granted in part; general declarations refused; specific declarations granted confirming compliance and lack of further entitlement.
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Shareholder Disputes, Jurisdiction Clauses, Directors' Duties, Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ferand Business Corporation
Claimant
Angeliki Frangou
Claimant
Maritime Enterprises Management S.A.
Claimant
Maritime Investments Holdings Limited
First Defendant/additional Claimant
Kolen International S.A.
Second Defendant/additional Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim for Declaratory Relief / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the service of Extra Judicial Notices (EJNs) in Greece breached the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Stockholder Agreement
- 2 Whether the defendants are entitled to demand further financial and management information from the claimants
- 3 Whether the claimants have provided all required accounts and information under the Stockholder Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the service of the Extra Judicial Notices in Greece did not constitute a breach of the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the Stockholder Agreement, as they did not amount to formal legal proceedings. The court further found that the claimants had provided all required financial statements and information to the defendants as required by the Stockholder Agreement, and that the defendants were not entitled to further information or to make the demands set out in the EJNs. The court refused to grant general or tendentious declarations but granted specific declarations confirming compliance with the agreement and the lack of entitlement to further demands.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted in part; general declarations refused; specific declarations granted confirming compliance and lack of further entitlement.
Orders
- Specific declarations granted that the claimants have provided all required financial statements and information under the Stockholder Agreement.
- Declarations that the defendants are not entitled to further information or to make the demands set out in the Extra Judicial Notices.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment