Office Depot International (UK) Ltd v UBS Asset Management (UK) Ltd & Ors
The claim for declaratory relief against the landlord (UBS Triton) is not justiciable as there is no crystallised dispute or positive case as to the works required; the court will not determine in the abstract what works may satisfy a repairing covenant. The claims against Amec and FK are inadequately pleaded as they are contingent on a determination not sought and do not identify a positive case as to remedial works or loss. The court strikes out the claims against the first and fourth defendants, refuses the current amendment against the second and third defendants, but grants OD a final opportunity to plead a proper case.
- Parties
- Claimant: Office Depot International (UK) Limited; First Defendant: UBS Asset Management (UK) Limited; Second Defendant: Amec Foster Wheeler Group Limited; Third Defendant: FK Facades Limited; Fourth Defendant: UBS Triton General Partner Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/construction) / Interlocutory Applications (amendment of Pleadings, Strike Out, Summary Judgment)
- Outcome
- Claims against first and fourth defendants struck out; application to amend against second and third defendants adjourned with directions; permission to serve late replies granted; costs awarded to defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Collateral Warranties, Repairing Covenants, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Limitation of Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Office Depot International (UK) Limited
Claimant
UBS Asset Management (UK) Limited
First Defendant
Amec Foster Wheeler Group Limited
Second Defendant
FK Facades Limited
Third Defendant
UBS Triton General Partner Limited
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/construction) / Interlocutory Applications (amendment of Pleadings, Strike Out, Summary Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise discretion to grant declaratory relief determining the performance required to satisfy a tenant’s obligations under a commercial lease
- 2 Whether the claims against the defendants, including contingent claims for repair costs, are adequately pleaded
- 3 Whether the particulars of claim should be amended or struck out
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for declaratory relief against the landlord (UBS Triton) is not justiciable as there is no crystallised dispute or positive case as to the works required; the court will not determine in the abstract what works may satisfy a repairing covenant. The claims against Amec and FK are inadequately pleaded as they are contingent on a determination not sought and do not identify a positive case as to remedial works or loss. The court strikes out the claims against the first and fourth defendants, refuses the current amendment against the second and third defendants, but grants OD a final opportunity to plead a proper case.
Court Disposition
Claims against first and fourth defendants struck out; application to amend against second and third defendants adjourned with directions; permission to serve late replies granted; costs awarded to defendants.
Orders
- Claim against first defendant struck out.
- Claim against fourth defendant struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment