AXA SA v Genworth Financial International Holdings, Inc. & Ors [2018] EWHC 2898 (Comm) (01 November 2018)
Genworth's Part 20 Claim is an abuse of the declaratory form of relief, as it seeks to force litigation between FICL/FACL and Santander regarding PPI mis-selling liabilities without a legitimate interest, prior to payment under clause 10.8 and in breach of the arbitration agreement. The claim is demurrable and embarrassing, and Genworth lacks locus to seek declarations regarding liabilities between parties to contracts to which it is not privy. The Part 20 Claim and relevant paragraphs of the Defence are struck out.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 2898 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: AXA S. A.; Defendant / Part 20 Claimant: Genworth Financial International Holdings, Inc.; Defendant / Part 20 Claimant: Genworth Financial, Inc.; Part 20 Defendant: Financial Insurance Company Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Financial Assurance Company Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Santander Cards UK Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Santander Insurance Services UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim and Part 20 Claim / Application to Strike Out/dismiss Part 20 Claim and Parts of Defence
- Outcome
- Part 20 Claim struck out in its entirety; paragraphs 10 and 11 of Defence and Counterclaim (except first sentence of paragraph 10) struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Subrogation, Abuse of Process, Indemnity, Arbitration Agreements, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AXA S. A.
Claimant
Genworth Financial International Holdings, Inc.
Defendant / Part 20 Claimant
Genworth Financial, Inc.
Defendant / Part 20 Claimant
Financial Insurance Company Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Financial Assurance Company Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Santander Cards UK Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Santander Insurance Services UK Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim and Part 20 Claim / Application to Strike Out/dismiss Part 20 Claim and Parts of Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Genworth's Part 20 Claim for declaratory relief is an abuse of process
- 2 Whether Genworth has a legitimate interest to seek declarations regarding liabilities between FICL/FACL and Santander
- 3 Whether the Part 20 Claim should be struck out or dismissed under CPR 3.4(2)(a)/(b) or CPR 24.2
Ratio Decidendi
Genworth's Part 20 Claim is an abuse of the declaratory form of relief, as it seeks to force litigation between FICL/FACL and Santander regarding PPI mis-selling liabilities without a legitimate interest, prior to payment under clause 10.8 and in breach of the arbitration agreement. The claim is demurrable and embarrassing, and Genworth lacks locus to seek declarations regarding liabilities between parties to contracts to which it is not privy. The Part 20 Claim and relevant paragraphs of the Defence are struck out.
Court Disposition
Part 20 Claim struck out in its entirety; paragraphs 10 and 11 of Defence and Counterclaim (except first sentence of paragraph 10) struck out.
Orders
- Strike out of Genworth's Part 20 Claim
- Strike out of paragraphs 10 and 11 of Defence and Counterclaim (except first sentence of paragraph 10)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment