Burns v Bridge & Anor [2024] EWHC 2620 (Ch) (18 October 2024)
The definition of 'Lender's Debt' in the 2019 Deed of Priorities includes all monies and liabilities due to PFL by Mr Bridge up to £850,000, plus all interest (including compound interest as per the loan agreement) and all costs, charges, and expenses properly incurred by PFL as mortgagee in possession. The Deed does not limit 'interest' to simple interest nor 'costs' to legal costs of proceedings. On the evidence, PFL did not fail to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable for the Houses, and no surplus is due to Mrs Burns from the proceeds of sale.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2620 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Sheila Burns; First Defendant: Fred Bridge; Second Defendant: Property Funding Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Business and Property Courts / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed as against Property Funding Limited; no surplus due to Mrs Burns.
- Legal Topics
- Deed of Priorities, Mortgagee's Rights, Compound Interest, Priority of Charges, Interpretation of Contracts, Sale at Undervalue, Trusts in Mortgage Context
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sheila Burns
Claimant
Fred Bridge
First Defendant
Property Funding Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Business and Property Courts / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper interpretation of 'Lender's Debt' in the 2019 Deed of Priorities, specifically the meaning of 'interest' and 'costs'
- 2 Whether Property Funding Limited failed to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable for the sale of the Houses, requiring an account to Mrs Burns
Ratio Decidendi
The definition of 'Lender's Debt' in the 2019 Deed of Priorities includes all monies and liabilities due to PFL by Mr Bridge up to £850,000, plus all interest (including compound interest as per the loan agreement) and all costs, charges, and expenses properly incurred by PFL as mortgagee in possession. The Deed does not limit 'interest' to simple interest nor 'costs' to legal costs of proceedings. On the evidence, PFL did not fail to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable for the Houses, and no surplus is due to Mrs Burns from the proceeds of sale.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed as against Property Funding Limited; no surplus due to Mrs Burns.
Orders
- Claim against Property Funding Limited dismissed.
- No order for payment of surplus to Mrs Burns.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment