ESR Insurance Services Ltd. v Clemons & Ors [2008] EWHC 2023 (Comm) (11 August 2008)
Default judgment is granted against the first and third to seventh defendants as they failed to acknowledge service within the prescribed period after proper service. The second defendant is granted an extension of time to file acknowledgment of service due to late but prompt action and recent access to legal advice, and the claim against him may proceed to summary judgment with directions for evidence and hearing.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 2023 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: ESR Insurance Services Limited (In Administration); First Defendant: Wendell Clemons; Second Defendant: David Bedford; Third Defendant: Plex Partners One LLC; Fourth Defendant: Anjen International Holdings Limited; Fifth Defendant: Bermier Platinum Entertainment Inc; Sixth Defendant: Black Pearl Entertainment; Seventh Defendant: Manchester Holdings Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim (part 7) / Application for Default Judgment and Extension of Time for Acknowledgment of Service
- Outcome
- Default judgment granted against first and third to seventh defendants; extension of time granted to second defendant to file acknowledgment of service; directions for summary judgment application against second defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Acknowledgment of Service, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Fraud, Freezing Order, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ESR Insurance Services Limited (In Administration)
Claimant
Wendell Clemons
First Defendant
David Bedford
Second Defendant
Plex Partners One LLC
Third Defendant
Anjen International Holdings Limited
Fourth Defendant
Bermier Platinum Entertainment Inc
Fifth Defendant
Black Pearl Entertainment
Sixth Defendant
Manchester Holdings Inc
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (part 7) / Application for Default Judgment and Extension of Time for Acknowledgment of Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to default judgment against defendants who failed to acknowledge service
- 2 Whether the second defendant should be granted an extension of time to file acknowledgment of service
- 3 Whether the claim against the second defendant should be limited to breach of fiduciary duty
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment is granted against the first and third to seventh defendants as they failed to acknowledge service within the prescribed period after proper service. The second defendant is granted an extension of time to file acknowledgment of service due to late but prompt action and recent access to legal advice, and the claim against him may proceed to summary judgment with directions for evidence and hearing.
Court Disposition
Default judgment granted against first and third to seventh defendants; extension of time granted to second defendant to file acknowledgment of service; directions for summary judgment application against second defendant.
Orders
- Judgment in the principal sum of £2,661,892.24 plus interest (£595,060.93 as of 11 August 2008) against first and third to seventh defendants.
- Second defendant granted extension of time to 31 July 2008 to file acknowledgment of service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment