Goldcrest Distribution Ltd v McCole & Ors [2016] EWHC 1571 (Ch) (30 June 2016)
The claimant demonstrated real prospects of successfully defending the counterclaim on all four substantive issues (regulated mortgage contract, s.284 void disposition, trust for the daughter, undue influence), raising triable issues suitable for trial. Although the claimant's application to set aside was not made promptly and the default was serious, the existence of real prospects of success outweighed the delay. The Deputy Master was not wrong to grant declaratory relief on default judgment in the circumstances, but the judgment should be set aside to allow the claimant to defend the counterclaim.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 1571 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Goldcrest Distribution Limited; First Defendant: Charles Joseph McCole; Second Defendant/respondent: Mary Orr McCole; Third Defendant: Jeremy Willmont, trustee in bankruptcy of Charles Joseph McCole
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim (possession and Declaratory Relief) / Application to Set Aside/vary Default Judgment Under CPR 13.3
- Outcome
- Application granted; default judgment set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Regulated Mortgage Contracts, Bankruptcy and Void Dispositions, Trusts of Land, Undue Influence, Declaratory Relief, Relief From Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goldcrest Distribution Limited
Claimant/applicant
Charles Joseph McCole
First Defendant
Mary Orr McCole
Second Defendant/respondent
Jeremy Willmont, trustee in bankruptcy of Charles Joseph McCole
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim (possession and Declaratory Relief) / Application to Set Aside/vary Default Judgment Under CPR 13.3
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment on the counterclaim should be set aside or varied under CPR 13.3
- 2 Whether the claimant has a real prospect of successfully defending the counterclaim
- 3 Whether there is some other good reason to set aside or vary the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant demonstrated real prospects of successfully defending the counterclaim on all four substantive issues (regulated mortgage contract, s.284 void disposition, trust for the daughter, undue influence), raising triable issues suitable for trial. Although the claimant's application to set aside was not made promptly and the default was serious, the existence of real prospects of success outweighed the delay. The Deputy Master was not wrong to grant declaratory relief on default judgment in the circumstances, but the judgment should be set aside to allow the claimant to defend the counterclaim.
Court Disposition
Application granted; default judgment set aside.
Orders
- Default judgment of 17 February 2016 set aside as against the Second Defendant's counterclaim.
- Claimant granted permission to file and serve a defence to counterclaim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment