Quality Solicitors Harris Waters v Okonkwo [2020] EWHC 1168 (QB) (12 May 2020)
The application for permission to appeal was refused because there was no merit in any of the grounds advanced: there was no procedural irregularity, complaints about enforcement officers were not grounds to stay the writ of control, and the default judgment could not be challenged further as appeal rights were exhausted.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1168
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Quality Solicitors Harris Waters; Defendant/appellant: Diana Okonkwo
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Writ of Control, Permission to Appeal, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Quality Solicitors Harris Waters
Claimant/respondent
Diana Okonkwo
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has grounds to appeal the refusal to stay the writ of control
- 2 Whether there was a serious procedural irregularity in the proceedings
- 3 Whether the writ of control should be stayed due to alleged fraud or deception
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was refused because there was no merit in any of the grounds advanced: there was no procedural irregularity, complaints about enforcement officers were not grounds to stay the writ of control, and the default judgment could not be challenged further as appeal rights were exhausted.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal against paragraphs (1) and (2) of the order of HHJ Ambrose dated 19 November 2019 is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment