Quality Solicitors Harris Waters v Okonkwo [2020] EWHC 1168 (QB) (12 May 2020)
There was no procedural irregularity, no evidence of fraud affecting the validity of the writ of control, and the default judgment stands as appeal rights have been exhausted. The application for permission to appeal is wholly without merit.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1168 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Quality Solicitors Harris Waters; Defendant/appellant: Diana Okonkwo
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Writ of Control, Permission to Appeal, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Quality Solicitors Harris Waters
Claimant/respondent
Diana Okonkwo
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted against refusal to stay writ of control
- 2 Whether there was a serious procedural irregularity
- 3 Whether allegations of fraud or deception justify a stay of enforcement
Ratio Decidendi
There was no procedural irregularity, no evidence of fraud affecting the validity of the writ of control, and the default judgment stands as appeal rights have been exhausted. The application for permission to appeal is wholly without merit.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Refusal of permission to appeal against paragraphs (1) and (2) of the order of HHJ Ambrose dated 19 November 2019
- No civil restraint order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment