Baker v KTM Sportmotorcycle UK Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 378 (03 May 2017)
The susceptibility of the motorcycle's braking system to galvanic corrosion after limited, normal use and proper maintenance constituted a defect under section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. It was not necessary to identify the precise nature of the defect; the fact that such corrosion occurred in these circumstances was sufficient to infer a defect. The defect caused the accident and resulting injury.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 378
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Baker; Appellant/respondent: KTM Sportmotorcycle UK Ltd & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Defective Products, Consumer Protection Act 1987, Design Defect, Manufacturing Defect, Causation, Standard of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Baker
Respondent/claimant
KTM Sportmotorcycle UK Ltd & Anr
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether galvanic corrosion in the motorcycle's braking system constituted a defect under section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987
- 2 Whether the defect caused the accident and injury
- 3 Whether it was necessary to prove the precise mechanism or specific design/manufacturing defect
Ratio Decidendi
The susceptibility of the motorcycle's braking system to galvanic corrosion after limited, normal use and proper maintenance constituted a defect under section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. It was not necessary to identify the precise nature of the defect; the fact that such corrosion occurred in these circumstances was sufficient to infer a defect. The defect caused the accident and resulting injury.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Costs of and occasioned by the appeal to be paid by the appellant to the respondent, to be assessed by detailed assessment if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment