Sessay, R (on the application of) v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2011] EWHC 2617 (QB) (13 October 2011)
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides an exhaustive statutory code for the detention of non-compliant incapacitated patients in hospital. There is no residual common law power of necessity to detain such patients outside the statutory scheme. The Claimant was deprived of her liberty for thirteen hours without lawful authority, as neither the Mental Capacity Act 2005 nor the common law doctrine of necessity provided a legal basis for her detention. The Trust's actions constituted false imprisonment and a breach of Article 5 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2617 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Sawida Sessay; First Defendant: South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; Second Defendant: The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; declaration granted; detention found unlawful.
- Legal Topics
- Deprivation of Liberty, False Imprisonment, Mental Capacity, Statutory Interpretation, Article 5 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Police Powers, Hospital Detention Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sawida Sessay
Claimant
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
First Defendant
The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Mental Health Act 1983 provides an exhaustive statutory code for the detention of non-compliant incapacitated patients for assessment and treatment in hospital.
- 2 Whether the common law doctrine of necessity can justify detention in hospital outside the statutory scheme.
- 3 Whether the Claimant was unlawfully deprived of her liberty in breach of Article 5 ECHR and/or falsely imprisoned at common law.
Ratio Decidendi
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides an exhaustive statutory code for the detention of non-compliant incapacitated patients in hospital. There is no residual common law power of necessity to detain such patients outside the statutory scheme. The Claimant was deprived of her liberty for thirteen hours without lawful authority, as neither the Mental Capacity Act 2005 nor the common law doctrine of necessity provided a legal basis for her detention. The Trust's actions constituted false imprisonment and a breach of Article 5 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; declaration granted; detention found unlawful.
Orders
- Declaration that sections 135 and 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 are the exclusive powers available to police officers to remove persons who appear to be mentally disordered to a place of safety.
- Declaration that sections 5 and 6 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 do not confer on police officers authority to remove persons to hospital or other places of safety for the purposes set out in sections 135 and 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment