ACC & Ors ( property and affairs deputy ; recovering assets costs for legal proceedings) [2020] EWCOP 9 (27 February 2020 )
A property and affairs deputy’s general authority does not extend to conducting litigation or instructing solicitors for contentious matters without specific court authorisation, except for modest non-contentious legal advice up to £2,000 + VAT. Where a deputy instructs their own or associated firm, robust conflict management is required, including obtaining comparative quotes. Retrospective authorisation for costs may be granted if the deputy acted in P’s best interests. Deputies or associated persons should not charge for acting as litigation friend without specific court authority.
- Citation
- [2020] EWCOP 9
- Parties
- Applicant Deputy for ACC and HPP: Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd; Applicant Deputy for JDJ: Kelly Greig; Litigation Friend for Acc, Hpp, JDJ: Official Solicitor; Second Respondent: Public Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Property and Affairs / Judgment on Joined Applications for Authorisation of Legal Costs and Guidance
- Outcome
- Applications for retrospective authorisation of legal costs for ACC and JDJ granted; application for authority to charge for acting as litigation friend in HPP refused.
- Legal Topics
- Deputyship, Legal Costs, Conflict of Interest, Authority to Instruct Solicitors, Litigation Friend, Retrospective Authorisation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd
Applicant Deputy for ACC and HPP
Kelly Greig
Applicant Deputy for JDJ
Official Solicitor
Litigation Friend for Acc, Hpp, JDJ
Public Guardian
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Property and Affairs / Judgment on Joined Applications for Authorisation of Legal Costs and Guidance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and in what circumstances a property and affairs deputy can recover from the protected person’s assets costs incurred in legal proceedings, especially when instructing their own or associated firm;
- 2 What authorisation is required for a deputy to conduct litigation or instruct solicitors;
- 3 Whether a deputy or associated trust corporation can act as litigation friend and charge for so acting;
Ratio Decidendi
A property and affairs deputy’s general authority does not extend to conducting litigation or instructing solicitors for contentious matters without specific court authorisation, except for modest non-contentious legal advice up to £2,000 + VAT. Where a deputy instructs their own or associated firm, robust conflict management is required, including obtaining comparative quotes. Retrospective authorisation for costs may be granted if the deputy acted in P’s best interests. Deputies or associated persons should not charge for acting as litigation friend without specific court authority.
Court Disposition
Applications for retrospective authorisation of legal costs for ACC and JDJ granted; application for authority to charge for acting as litigation friend in HPP refused.
Orders
- Retrospective authorisation granted for legal costs incurred by deputies for ACC and JDJ.
- Authority to charge for acting as litigation friend in HPP refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment