Gerard Chimbganda v Judith Kundodyiwa & Anor

Gerard Chimbganda v Judith Kundodyiwa & Anor

Permission is granted to continue the derivative claim because a prima facie case is established, the claim is not abusive despite overlap with the section 994 petition, and a hypothetical board could reasonably decide to pursue the action to protect the company's interests, employees, and creditors. The Claimant's withdrawal of the indemnity request and acceptance of personal liability for costs further supports permission.

Parties
Claimant: Gerard Chimbganda; First Defendant: Judith Kundodyiwa; Second Defendant: Goodpeople Health Care Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Derivative Claim / Second Stage Permission Application
Outcome
Permission granted to continue derivative action.
Legal Topics
Derivative Actions, Directors' Duties, Unfair Prejudice, Case Management
Company Law Shareholder Disputes Derivative Actions Directors' Duties Unfair Prejudice Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gerard Chimbganda

Claimant

Judith Kundodyiwa

First Defendant

Goodpeople Health Care Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Derivative Claim / Second Stage Permission Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to continue a derivative claim where there is an overlapping section 994 shareholder petition
  2. 2 Whether the derivative claim is pursued in good faith and for the benefit of the company
  3. 3 Whether the existence of alternative remedies (section 994 petition) bars the derivative claim

Ratio Decidendi

Permission is granted to continue the derivative claim because a prima facie case is established, the claim is not abusive despite overlap with the section 994 petition, and a hypothetical board could reasonably decide to pursue the action to protect the company's interests, employees, and creditors. The Claimant's withdrawal of the indemnity request and acceptance of personal liability for costs further supports permission.

Court Disposition

Permission granted to continue derivative action.

Orders

  • Permission granted for continuation of the derivative claim.
  • Claimant to bear personal liability for costs without recourse to indemnity from the company.