Durnont Enterprises Limited v Fazita Investment Limited & Ors
Permission to continue derivative claims is granted in part: the Claimant established a prima facie case under Polish, Cypriot, and English law for claims against the First to Fifth Defendants but not against the Sixth to Eighth Defendants. The English court is the proper forum, and service out of the jurisdiction is permitted for claims where a serious issue to be tried is shown and the jurisdictional gateways are satisfied. The claims are not time-barred on the evidence presented. Permission to amend the Particulars of Claim and to rely on expert evidence is granted. Applications to remove documents from the court file or restrict their use are refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Durnont Enterprises Limited; First Defendant: Fazita Investment Limited; Second Defendant: Wladyslaw Jaroszewicz; Third Defendant: Michael Carl Jaroszewicz; Fourth Defendant: M-JWK-Management Spółka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnością; Fifth Defendant: Anna Bandurska; Sixth Defendant: Jan Czeremcha; Seventh Defendant: Maciej de Makay; Eighth Defendant: BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.; Ninth Defendant: Polish Real Estate Investment Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action / Commercial Claim / Ruling on Permission to Continue Derivative Action and Service Out of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Permission granted in part; service out of jurisdiction granted in part; ancillary applications granted or refused as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Actions, Jurisdiction and Service Out, Directors' Duties, Breach of Contract, Fraud, Limitation of Actions, Reflective Loss, Restitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Durnont Enterprises Limited
Claimant
Fazita Investment Limited
First Defendant
Wladyslaw Jaroszewicz
Second Defendant
Michael Carl Jaroszewicz
Third Defendant
M-JWK-Management Spółka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnością
Fourth Defendant
Anna Bandurska
Fifth Defendant
Jan Czeremcha
Sixth Defendant
Maciej de Makay
Seventh Defendant
BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.
Eighth Defendant
Polish Real Estate Investment Limited
Ninth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action / Commercial Claim / Ruling on Permission to Continue Derivative Action and Service Out of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to continue derivative claims against certain defendants under common law and CPR r. 19.15
- 2 Whether permission should be granted to serve the claim form and other documents out of the jurisdiction
- 3 Whether the claims disclose a prima facie case under Polish, Cypriot, and English law
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to continue derivative claims is granted in part: the Claimant established a prima facie case under Polish, Cypriot, and English law for claims against the First to Fifth Defendants but not against the Sixth to Eighth Defendants. The English court is the proper forum, and service out of the jurisdiction is permitted for claims where a serious issue to be tried is shown and the jurisdictional gateways are satisfied. The claims are not time-barred on the evidence presented. Permission to amend the Particulars of Claim and to rely on expert evidence is granted. Applications to remove documents from the court file or restrict their use are refused.
Court Disposition
Permission granted in part; service out of jurisdiction granted in part; ancillary applications granted or refused as specified.
Orders
- Permission to continue derivative claims against Fazita, Wladyslaw Jaroszewicz, Michael Jaroszewicz, M-JWK, and Anna Bandurska.
- Permission to continue fiduciary duty claims against Wladyslaw Jaroszewicz and Michael Jaroszewicz.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment