Hughes v Weiss Re Iuvus Ltd [2012] EWHC 2363 (Ch) (15 August 2012)

Hughes v Weiss Re Iuvus Ltd [2012] EWHC 2363 (Ch) (15 August 2012)

Permission to continue the derivative claim is granted because the claimant has established a prima facie case of breach of duty and misappropriation of company assets by Mr Weiss, the acts were not authorised or ratified, a person acting in accordance with section 172 would seek to continue the claim, and the existence of alternative remedies does not preclude the derivative claim.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 2363 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Suzy Belinda Hughes; First Defendant: Nigel Richard Weiss; Second Defendant: Iuvus Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Derivative Claim Under Companies Act 2006 / Application for Permission to Continue Derivative Claim
Outcome
Permission granted to continue derivative claim.
Legal Topics
Derivative Claims, Directors' Fiduciary Duties, Misappropriation of Company Assets, Competition With Company, Diverting Company Payments
Company Law Civil Procedure Derivative Claims Directors' Fiduciary Duties Misappropriation of Company Assets Competition With Company Diverting Company Payments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suzy Belinda Hughes

Claimant

Nigel Richard Weiss

First Defendant

Iuvus Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Derivative Claim Under Companies Act 2006 / Application for Permission to Continue Derivative Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to continue derivative claims against Mr Weiss for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and misappropriation of company assets
  2. 2 Whether acts complained of were authorised or ratified by the company
  3. 3 Whether a person acting in accordance with section 172 would seek to continue the claim

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to continue the derivative claim is granted because the claimant has established a prima facie case of breach of duty and misappropriation of company assets by Mr Weiss, the acts were not authorised or ratified, a person acting in accordance with section 172 would seek to continue the claim, and the existence of alternative remedies does not preclude the derivative claim.

Court Disposition

Permission granted to continue derivative claim.

Orders

  • Permission granted to Ms Hughes to continue derivative claims against Mr Weiss under Companies Act 2006 s.261.
  • Proceedings to continue as derivative action.