T, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 801 (28 July 2016)

T, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 801 (28 July 2016)

The appellant could not qualify for temporary relief under the DDV Concession because her last grant of limited leave was not as the partner of a person settled in the UK, and the term 'partner' in E-DVILR 1.3 must be interpreted in that context. Therefore, she could not meet the requirements for indefinite leave to remain as a victim of domestic violence.

Citation
[2016] EWCA Civ 801
Parties
Claimant/appellant: T; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Destitute Domestic Violence Concession, Indefinite Leave to Remain, Interpretation of Immigration Rules, Domestic Violence Victims, Eligibility Criteria

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

T

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court) to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant qualifies for temporary relief under the Destitute Domestic Violence Concession (DDV Concession)
  2. 2 Proper interpretation of sections DVILR and E-DVILR of Appendix FM to the Immigration Rules
  3. 3 Meaning of 'partner' in the context of E-DVILR 1.3

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant could not qualify for temporary relief under the DDV Concession because her last grant of limited leave was not as the partner of a person settled in the UK, and the term 'partner' in E-DVILR 1.3 must be interpreted in that context. Therefore, she could not meet the requirements for indefinite leave to remain as a victim of domestic violence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed