Dr Oluremi Agbaje v The Robert Frew Medical Company Limited & Ors

Dr Oluremi Agbaje v The Robert Frew Medical Company Limited & Ors

The judge allowed or disallowed each challenged item based on whether the work was reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount, considering duplication, proportionality, and the appropriate grade of fee earner. The parties are directed to recalculate the bill in accordance with these decisions and submit a revised Precedent Q for further judgment.

Parties
Claimant/paying Party: Dr Oluremi Agbaje; Defendant/receiving Party: The Robert Frew Medical Company Limited; Defendant/receiving Party: Dr Oluwatoyin Ogunsanya; Defendant/receiving Party: Dr Margaret Odufuye; Defendant/receiving Party: Dr Atef Halim Wissa (deceased); Defendant/receiving Party: Dr Adegboyega Chakera; Defendant/receiving Party: Dr Shoaib Ibrahim (deceased)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Detailed Assessment of Costs / Item by Item Objections and Interim Judgment
Outcome
Interim judgment on item-by-item objections; directions for recalculation of bill and submission of revised Precedent Q.
Legal Topics
Detailed Assessment, Costs Management, Objections to Bill, Proportionality, Fee Earner Grades
Civil Procedure Costs Detailed Assessment Costs Management Objections to Bill Proportionality Fee Earner Grades

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Oluremi Agbaje

Claimant/paying Party

The Robert Frew Medical Company Limited

Defendant/receiving Party

Dr Oluwatoyin Ogunsanya

Defendant/receiving Party

Dr Margaret Odufuye

Defendant/receiving Party

Dr Atef Halim Wissa (deceased)

Defendant/receiving Party

Dr Adegboyega Chakera

Defendant/receiving Party

Dr Shoaib Ibrahim (deceased)

Defendant/receiving Party

Procedural Posture

Detailed Assessment of Costs / Item by Item Objections and Interim Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the challenged items in the bill of costs were reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount
  2. 2 Whether duplication or disproportionate costs should be disallowed
  3. 3 Whether attendance by higher or dual fee earners was justified

Ratio Decidendi

The judge allowed or disallowed each challenged item based on whether the work was reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount, considering duplication, proportionality, and the appropriate grade of fee earner. The parties are directed to recalculate the bill in accordance with these decisions and submit a revised Precedent Q for further judgment.

Court Disposition

Interim judgment on item-by-item objections; directions for recalculation of bill and submission of revised Precedent Q.

Orders

  • Parties to recalculate the bill based on the judge's item-by-item decisions and previous rulings.
  • Revised bill and Precedent Q to be submitted for further judgment.