Nouazli) R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608 (10 December 2013)
Administrative detention under regulation 24 of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 is not incompatible with Directive 2004/38/EC, provided the safeguards and proportionality requirements of the Directive are met. The differences in detention regimes between EEA nationals and third country nationals do not amount to unlawful discrimination under Article 18 TFEU. Arguments not raised before the lower court cannot be introduced on appeal.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 1608
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Rachid Nouazli; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Appeal From High Court (administrative Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Detention Pending Deportation, Compatibility of UK Law With EU Directive 2004/38/ec, Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality, Proportionality in Administrative Detention, Interpretation of Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/ec
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rachid Nouazli
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Appeal From High Court (administrative Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether administrative detention pending deportation under UK law is compatible with Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC
- 2 Whether regulation 24(1) and section 36 of the UK Borders Act 2007 are compatible with European law
- 3 Whether the appellant's detention was unlawfully discriminatory on grounds of nationality
Ratio Decidendi
Administrative detention under regulation 24 of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 is not incompatible with Directive 2004/38/EC, provided the safeguards and proportionality requirements of the Directive are met. The differences in detention regimes between EEA nationals and third country nationals do not amount to unlawful discrimination under Article 18 TFEU. Arguments not raised before the lower court cannot be introduced on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment