Nouazli) R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Nouazli) R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Administrative detention pending deportation is compatible with Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC provided proportionality and public policy grounds are satisfied; regulation 24(1) and section 36(1) UK Borders Act 2007 are not incompatible with EU law; no unlawful discrimination occurred as EEA nationals are subject to a distinct legal regime; new arguments not raised below cannot be pursued on appeal.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Rachid Nouazli; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Detention Pending Deportation, Compatibility of National Law With EU Directive, Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality, Proportionality in Administrative Detention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rachid Nouazli

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether administrative detention pending deportation is compatible with Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC
  2. 2 Whether regulation 24(1) and section 36 of the UK Borders Act 2007 are compatible with European law
  3. 3 Whether detention under regulation 24(1) involved unlawful discrimination on grounds of nationality

Ratio Decidendi

Administrative detention pending deportation is compatible with Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC provided proportionality and public policy grounds are satisfied; regulation 24(1) and section 36(1) UK Borders Act 2007 are not incompatible with EU law; no unlawful discrimination occurred as EEA nationals are subject to a distinct legal regime; new arguments not raised below cannot be pursued on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed