Ashdown Forest Economic Development LLP v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Ors [2014] EWHC 406 (Admin) (21 February 2014)
The Court held that the adoption of the Core Strategy was lawful. The Inspector's decision to accept a reduced housing requirement was rational and based on proportionate evidence, including environmental constraints and statutory consultee advice. The requirements of the SEA Directive and Environmental Assessment Regulations were met, as reasonable alternatives were assessed and explained. The screening exercise under the Habitats Regulations was lawfully conducted, and no appropriate assessment was required at the housing levels adopted. The 7 km SANG zone policy was justified and lawfully adopted. None of the grounds advanced by the Claimant were made out.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 406 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ashdown Forest Economic Development Llp; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Wealden District Council; Third Defendant: South Downs National Park Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Development Plan Documents, Habitats Directive, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Judicial Review, Local Plans, Appropriate Assessment, Sustainability Appraisal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashdown Forest Economic Development Llp
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Wealden District Council
Second Defendant
South Downs National Park Authority
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adoption of the Wealden District Core Strategy Local Plan was unlawful due to irrationality or procedural error in setting the housing requirement.
- 2 Whether the requirements of the SEA Directive and Environmental Assessment Regulations were complied with regarding assessment of alternatives and environmental impacts.
- 3 Whether the Habitats Directive and Habitats Regulations were breached by failure to carry out an appropriate assessment regarding nitrogen deposition on Ashdown Forest.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the adoption of the Core Strategy was lawful. The Inspector's decision to accept a reduced housing requirement was rational and based on proportionate evidence, including environmental constraints and statutory consultee advice. The requirements of the SEA Directive and Environmental Assessment Regulations were met, as reasonable alternatives were assessed and explained. The screening exercise under the Habitats Regulations was lawfully conducted, and no appropriate assessment was required at the housing levels adopted. The 7 km SANG zone policy was justified and lawfully adopted. None of the grounds advanced by the Claimant were made out.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim for judicial review is dismissed.
- No order quashing or remitting the Core Strategy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment