Arsenal Football Club Plc v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor

Arsenal Football Club Plc v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor

The Inspector lawfully assessed the proposal's conformity with the development plan as a whole, giving dominant weight to amenity and noise policies, and was not required to give overriding effect to economic and cultural policies; no legal error occurred.

Parties
Claimant: Arsenal Football Club Plc; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Islington London Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Development Plan Compliance, Noise Nuisance, Economic and Cultural Planning Policies, Section 38(6) Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arsenal Football Club Plc

Claimant

Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

First Defendant

Islington London Borough Council

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law by failing to assess overall conformity with the development plan under section 38(6)
  2. 2 Whether breach of specific development management policies equates to breach of the development plan as a whole
  3. 3 Weight to be given to economic and cultural policies versus amenity and noise policies

Ratio Decidendi

The Inspector lawfully assessed the proposal's conformity with the development plan as a whole, giving dominant weight to amenity and noise policies, and was not required to give overriding effect to economic and cultural policies; no legal error occurred.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed