PGF II SA & Anor v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc & Anor [2010] EWHC 1459 (TCC) (13 July 2010)
Damages for breach of repairing covenants are limited to the diminution in value of the reversion as at the date of lease termination, taking into account the landlord's intention and the doctrine of supercession. Where refurbishment or redevelopment is not decided at the termination date, damages may include the value of repairs that would survive refurbishment. The statutory cap under Section 18(1) applies, and the standard of repair is that required for a 1973 prestige City building, not modern standards.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 1459 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: PGF II S. A; Claimant: PGF II(LIME) S. A; 1st Defendant: Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC; 2nd Defendant: London & Edinburgh Insurance Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Lease Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Damages awarded to Claimants, subject to statutory cap and deduction for superceded works.
- Legal Topics
- Dilapidations, Damages, Leasehold Covenants, Section 18 Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, Supercession, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PGF II S. A
Claimant
PGF II(LIME) S. A
Claimant
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC
1st Defendant
London & Edinburgh Insurance Company Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Lease Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Measure of damages for breach of repairing covenants
- 2 Application of Section 18(1) Landlord and Tenant Act 1927
- 3 Effect of landlord's intention to refurbish or redevelop
Ratio Decidendi
Damages for breach of repairing covenants are limited to the diminution in value of the reversion as at the date of lease termination, taking into account the landlord's intention and the doctrine of supercession. Where refurbishment or redevelopment is not decided at the termination date, damages may include the value of repairs that would survive refurbishment. The statutory cap under Section 18(1) applies, and the standard of repair is that required for a 1973 prestige City building, not modern standards.
Court Disposition
Damages awarded to Claimants, subject to statutory cap and deduction for superceded works.
Orders
- Defendants to pay damages for breach of repairing covenants, limited to diminution in value of the reversion as determined by the court.
- Damages to be calculated based on works surviving refurbishment, with deduction for superceded items.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment