National Bank Trust v Yurov & Ors [2020] EWHC 100 (Comm) (23 January 2020)
The Shareholders, as directors and controlling persons, breached their duties under Russian law by orchestrating and implementing a dishonest scheme of balance sheet management, involving related-party lending, falsification of accounts, and concealment of losses. Their actions were not in the Bank's best interests, were unreasonable, and caused substantial loss to the Bank. The evidence established bad faith, personal benefit, and direct causation of damages. Liability is not excluded by limitation or time bar arguments.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 100 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: National Bank Trust; First Defendant: Ilya Yurov; Second Defendant: Sergey Belyaev; Third Defendant: Nikolay Fetisov; Fourth Defendant: Nataliya Yurova; Fifth Defendant: Irina Belyaeva; Sixth Defendant: Elena Pischulina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld against the Shareholders; Defendants found liable for breach of duty and fraud under Russian law.
- Legal Topics
- Directors' Duties, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Fraudulent Trading, Balance Sheet Management, Liability Under Russian Civil Code, Liability Under Joint Stock Companies Law, Personal Benefit From Corporate Transactions, Regulatory Compliance, Limitation of Liability, Causation and Quantum
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Bank Trust
Claimant
Ilya Yurov
First Defendant
Sergey Belyaev
Second Defendant
Nikolay Fetisov
Third Defendant
Nataliya Yurova
Fourth Defendant
Irina Belyaeva
Fifth Defendant
Elena Pischulina
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Were the Shareholders in breach of Article 71 of the JSC Law and/or Article 53 of the Russian Civil Code in respect of the Loans and Transactions?
- 2 Did the Shareholders orchestrate a fraudulent scheme involving balance sheet management and related-party lending?
- 3 Did the Shareholders personally benefit from the scheme?
Ratio Decidendi
The Shareholders, as directors and controlling persons, breached their duties under Russian law by orchestrating and implementing a dishonest scheme of balance sheet management, involving related-party lending, falsification of accounts, and concealment of losses. Their actions were not in the Bank's best interests, were unreasonable, and caused substantial loss to the Bank. The evidence established bad faith, personal benefit, and direct causation of damages. Liability is not excluded by limitation or time bar arguments.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld against the Shareholders; Defendants found liable for breach of duty and fraud under Russian law.
Orders
- Defendants to pay damages to National Bank Trust in respect of losses caused by the fraudulent scheme.
- Defendants' assets remain subject to Worldwide Freezing Order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment