Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 387 (18 April 2008)

Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 387 (18 April 2008)

The Court held that the right of a director to inspect company records exists to enable the director to carry out duties for the benefit of the company, and may be refused if inspection is sought for an improper purpose. As there was a serious issue to be tried as to whether OLG sought inspection for a proper purpose, summary judgment was rightly refused.

Citation
[2008] EWCA Civ 387
Parties
Claimant/appellant: The Oxford Legal Group Limited; Defendant/respondent: Sibbasbridge Services PLC; Defendant/respondent: Mr Christian Hoyer Millar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Director's Right of Inspection, Summary Judgment, Improper Purpose, Disclosure of Company Records, Section 222 Companies Act 1985

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Oxford Legal Group Limited

Claimant/appellant

Sibbasbridge Services PLC

Defendant/respondent

Mr Christian Hoyer Millar

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a director's right to inspect company records can be refused if sought for an improper purpose
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted for inspection of records under section 222 Companies Act 1985

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the right of a director to inspect company records exists to enable the director to carry out duties for the benefit of the company, and may be refused if inspection is sought for an improper purpose. As there was a serious issue to be tried as to whether OLG sought inspection for a proper purpose, summary judgment was rightly refused.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment refused
  • Claim transferred to Companies Court to be heard with pending section 459 petition