Nicholas Eckland v Chief Constable of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary
The Chief Constable is liable for the acts and omissions of the police misconduct panel under section 42(1) of the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. The Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claim, and no effective or equivalent alternative remedy exists under section 29(6) in the County Court. The Supreme Court's decision in P is binding notwithstanding regulatory amendments.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Nicholas Eckland; Respondent/appellant: Chief Constable of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary; First Intervener: National Association of Legally Qualified Chairs; Second Intervener: Independent Office for Police Conduct; Third Intervener: Association of Police and Crime Commissioners
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (from Employment Appeal Tribunal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Attribution of Liability, Police Misconduct Panels, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal, EU Law Conformity, Remedies for Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Eckland
Claimant/respondent
Chief Constable of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary
Respondent/appellant
National Association of Legally Qualified Chairs
First Intervener
Independent Office for Police Conduct
Second Intervener
Association of Police and Crime Commissioners
Third Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal (from Employment Appeal Tribunal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Chief Constable is liable for acts or omissions of an independent police misconduct panel under the Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear discrimination claims arising from acts of the panel
- 3 Whether the Supreme Court decision in P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis is binding under the amended regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Chief Constable is liable for the acts and omissions of the police misconduct panel under section 42(1) of the Equality Act 2010, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. The Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claim, and no effective or equivalent alternative remedy exists under section 29(6) in the County Court. The Supreme Court's decision in P is binding notwithstanding regulatory amendments.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by the Chief Constable is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment