Michael Cowie & Ors v Scottish Fire and Rescue Service
The preconditions for entitlement to paid special leave (requiring exhaustion of TOIL and annual leave) were inextricably linked to the favourable treatment of paid special leave and could not be artificially separated. There was no unfavourable treatment or particular disadvantage for the purposes of sections 15 or 19 EqA. The Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to liability. No award for injury to feelings was warranted in the absence of evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Mr Michael Cowie and Others; Respondent/appellant: Scottish Fire and Rescue Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed for respondent; claimants' appeal dismissed; Employment Tribunal's decision set aside and claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Indirect Sex Discrimination, Remedies for Discrimination, Unfavourable Treatment, Particular Disadvantage, Injury to Feelings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Michael Cowie and Others
Appellant/respondent
Scottish Fire and Rescue Service
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the preconditions for paid special leave during the coronavirus pandemic amounted to unfavourable treatment or disadvantage under section 15 and/or section 19 Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding group disadvantage for women under section 19 EqA
- 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in making no award for injury to feelings
Ratio Decidendi
The preconditions for entitlement to paid special leave (requiring exhaustion of TOIL and annual leave) were inextricably linked to the favourable treatment of paid special leave and could not be artificially separated. There was no unfavourable treatment or particular disadvantage for the purposes of sections 15 or 19 EqA. The Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to liability. No award for injury to feelings was warranted in the absence of evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed for respondent; claimants' appeal dismissed; Employment Tribunal's decision set aside and claims dismissed.
Orders
- Section 15 EqA claims dismissed.
- Section 19 EqA claims dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment