Sheeran & Ors v Chokri & Ors [2021] EWHC 3553 (Ch) (02 December 2021)
Claimants' disclosure was inadequate in several respects; further disclosure orders are proportionate for diaries, recordings, and voice notes, but not for broad communications or documentary edits/outtakes. Privilege was waived for instructions and communications relating to the Oxendale letter; redactions for irrelevant/confidential material were justified where explained by solicitor evidence.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 3553 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mr Edward Christopher Sheeran MBE; Claimant/respondent: Mr Steven McCutcheon; Claimant/respondent: Mr John McDaid; Claimant/respondent: Sony/ATV Music Publishing (UK) Limited; Claimant/respondent: Rokstone Music Limited; Claimant/respondent: Spirit B Unique JV SARL; Claimant/respondent: Kobalt Music Copyrights SARL; Defendant/applicant: Mr Sami Chokri; Defendant/applicant: Mr Ross O'Donoghue; Defendant/applicant: Artists and Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Disclosure Application in Copyright Infringement Action / Interlocutory Application for Further Disclosure Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; further disclosure ordered for specific categories, privilege waived for certain documents, other requests refused.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Copyright Infringement, Privilege, Waiver of Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Edward Christopher Sheeran MBE
Claimant/respondent
Mr Steven McCutcheon
Claimant/respondent
Mr John McDaid
Claimant/respondent
Sony/ATV Music Publishing (UK) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Rokstone Music Limited
Claimant/respondent
Spirit B Unique JV SARL
Claimant/respondent
Kobalt Music Copyrights SARL
Claimant/respondent
Mr Sami Chokri
Defendant/applicant
Mr Ross O'Donoghue
Defendant/applicant
Artists and Company Limited
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Disclosure Application in Copyright Infringement Action / Interlocutory Application for Further Disclosure Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants' disclosure was adequate under PD51U
- 2 Whether further disclosure orders are reasonable and proportionate
- 3 Whether privilege was waived in relation to certain documents
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants' disclosure was inadequate in several respects; further disclosure orders are proportionate for diaries, recordings, and voice notes, but not for broad communications or documentary edits/outtakes. Privilege was waived for instructions and communications relating to the Oxendale letter; redactions for irrelevant/confidential material were justified where explained by solicitor evidence.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; further disclosure ordered for specific categories, privilege waived for certain documents, other requests refused.
Orders
- Order for claimants to search for and produce diaries for listed individuals.
- Order for first claimant to search for and produce all recordings and notes relating to 'Shape of You' in native format.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment