Fiesta Hotels and Resorts SL & Ors v Deutsche Bank AG & Anor [2024] EWHC 1422 (Comm) (07 June 2024)
There was no arrangement or understanding giving the claimants practical control over the Saranac Recordings; Saranac's cooperation was voluntary and expressly limited. The class of documents sought for third party disclosure included irrelevant material and did not meet the threshold under CPR 31.17. Both applications were refused.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1422 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant/first Respondent: Fiesta Hotels and Resorts SL; Claimant/first Respondent: Residencial Marina SL; Claimant/first Respondent: Residencial Es Vive SA; Claimant/first Respondent: Dominican Entertainment (Luxembourg) SARL; Second Respondent: Saranac Partners Limited; Defendant/applicant: Deutsche Bank AG; Defendant/applicant: Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application for Disclosure / Interlocutory Application for Further and Third Party Disclosure
- Outcome
- Applications for further disclosure and third party disclosure refused.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Third Party Disclosure, Control of Documents, Reasonableness and Proportionality, CPR 31.17, Practice Direction 57 AD
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fiesta Hotels and Resorts SL
Claimant/first Respondent
Residencial Marina SL
Claimant/first Respondent
Residencial Es Vive SA
Claimant/first Respondent
Dominican Entertainment (Luxembourg) SARL
Claimant/first Respondent
Saranac Partners Limited
Second Respondent
Deutsche Bank AG
Defendant/applicant
Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application for Disclosure / Interlocutory Application for Further and Third Party Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants have practical control over Saranac Recordings for purposes of disclosure under PD 57AD
- 2 Whether third party disclosure against Saranac Partners Limited should be ordered under CPR 31.17
Ratio Decidendi
There was no arrangement or understanding giving the claimants practical control over the Saranac Recordings; Saranac's cooperation was voluntary and expressly limited. The class of documents sought for third party disclosure included irrelevant material and did not meet the threshold under CPR 31.17. Both applications were refused.
Court Disposition
Applications for further disclosure and third party disclosure refused.
Orders
- Application for further disclosure against claimants refused.
- Application for third party disclosure against Saranac Partners Limited refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment