Friend Media Technology Systems Ltd & Anor v Friend & Anor [2025] EWHC 2506 (KB) (01 October 2025)
The court held that the documents sought were either not within the Claimants' control, not of such relevance as to be necessary for the fair disposal of the proceedings, or that disclosure would not be reasonable or proportionate given the extensive disclosure already undertaken, the nature of the issues for trial, and the logistical and privacy concerns. Accordingly, both the specific and non-party disclosure applications were dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 2506 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Friend Media Technology Systems Limited; Claimant/respondent: Friend MTS Limited; Defendant/applicant: Jonathan Norman Friend; Defendant/applicant: Friend TP Limited; NEC Respondent: Andrew Skinner; NEC Respondent: Keven Parker; NEC Respondent: Michael Joseph; NEC Respondent: NorthEdge Capital LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Application in Ongoing High Court Proceedings / Application for Specific and Non Party Disclosure Prior to Expedited Trial on Liability and Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Specific Disclosure, Non Party Disclosure, Control of Documents, Fiduciary Duties, Injunctive Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Friend Media Technology Systems Limited
Claimant/respondent
Friend MTS Limited
Claimant/respondent
Jonathan Norman Friend
Defendant/applicant
Friend TP Limited
Defendant/applicant
Andrew Skinner
NEC Respondent
Keven Parker
NEC Respondent
Michael Joseph
NEC Respondent
NorthEdge Capital LLP
NEC Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interim Application in Ongoing High Court Proceedings / Application for Specific and Non Party Disclosure Prior to Expedited Trial on Liability and Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimants are required to provide specific disclosure of documents held by NEC-nominated directors (NEC Custodians)
- 2 Whether the court should order non-party disclosure against NEC Respondents under CPR 31.17
- 3 Whether the documents sought are in the Claimants' control
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the documents sought were either not within the Claimants' control, not of such relevance as to be necessary for the fair disposal of the proceedings, or that disclosure would not be reasonable or proportionate given the extensive disclosure already undertaken, the nature of the issues for trial, and the logistical and privacy concerns. Accordingly, both the specific and non-party disclosure applications were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- The Defendants' application for specific disclosure is dismissed.
- The Defendants' application for non-party disclosure is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment