Hipgnosis Music Limited v Merck Mercuriadis & Ors

Hipgnosis Music Limited v Merck Mercuriadis & Ors

The court approved the first defendant's narrower formulation of Issue 22 for disclosure, finding the claimant's approach too granular and inconsistent with PD57AD and relevant guidance. On costs, the court held that the first defendant's application for security for costs was premature but only modestly so, and awarded 90% of the claimed costs, summarily assessed.

Parties
Claimant: Hipgnosis Music Limited; First Defendant: Merck Mercuriadis; Second Defendant: Hipgnosis Songs Fund Limited; Third Defendant: Hipgnosis Song Management Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial/chancery / Judgment on Issues Reserved at CMC
Outcome
First defendant's formulation of Issue 22 approved; first defendant awarded 90% of costs for security for costs application.
Legal Topics
Disclosure, Security for Costs, Costs Assessment
Civil Procedure Company Law Disclosure Security for Costs Costs Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hipgnosis Music Limited

Claimant

Merck Mercuriadis

First Defendant

Hipgnosis Songs Fund Limited

Second Defendant

Hipgnosis Song Management Limited

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial/chancery / Judgment on Issues Reserved at CMC

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Proper formulation of Issue 22 for disclosure under PD57AD
  2. 2 Entitlement to costs for security for costs application

Ratio Decidendi

The court approved the first defendant's narrower formulation of Issue 22 for disclosure, finding the claimant's approach too granular and inconsistent with PD57AD and relevant guidance. On costs, the court held that the first defendant's application for security for costs was premature but only modestly so, and awarded 90% of the claimed costs, summarily assessed.

Court Disposition

First defendant's formulation of Issue 22 approved; first defendant awarded 90% of costs for security for costs application.

Orders

  • Issue 22 for disclosure to be as formulated by the first defendant.
  • Claimant to pay the first defendant £13,154.40 for costs of the security for costs application.