Rowe & Ors v Ingenious Media Holdings Plc & Ors
A two-stage process is ordered: (1) claimants must provide a schedule of investments (and specific potential tax planning schemes on which advice was sought or received) for a defined period before and after the Ingenious investments; (2) claimants must disclose documents sufficient to show the nature and risk of those investments, limited to tax planning schemes for non-adviser claims. This approach is proportionate, addresses the sophistication and loss issues, and avoids unnecessary extended disclosure.
- Parties
- Claimants: Mr Nigel Rowe & Others; Defendants: Ingenious Media Holdings PLC & Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Multi Party Financial Litigation / Case Management Conference (cmc 3) Disclosure Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for extended disclosure allowed in part; structured disclosure process ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Financial Adviser Negligence, Causation of Loss, Investment Sophistication, Tax Planning Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nigel Rowe & Others
Claimants
Ingenious Media Holdings PLC & Others
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Multi Party Financial Litigation / Case Management Conference (cmc 3) Disclosure Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants should give disclosure of other investments and/or investment advice sought or received
- 2 Appropriate scope and limits of such disclosure
- 3 Relevance of claimants' financial sophistication and investment history to claims against advisers and Ingenious Defendants
Ratio Decidendi
A two-stage process is ordered: (1) claimants must provide a schedule of investments (and specific potential tax planning schemes on which advice was sought or received) for a defined period before and after the Ingenious investments; (2) claimants must disclose documents sufficient to show the nature and risk of those investments, limited to tax planning schemes for non-adviser claims. This approach is proportionate, addresses the sophistication and loss issues, and avoids unnecessary extended disclosure.
Court Disposition
Application for extended disclosure allowed in part; structured disclosure process ordered.
Orders
- Claimants to provide a schedule of investments (and potential tax planning schemes advised upon) for each relevant period.
- Claimants to disclose documents sufficient to show the nature and risk of such investments, limited to tax planning schemes for non-adviser claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment