Euro-Asian Oil SA v Abilo (UK) Ltd & Anor

Euro-Asian Oil SA v Abilo (UK) Ltd & Anor

The disclosure sought is not relevant to any currently pleaded issue, nor is CPR 31.14 engaged as there is no specific mention or direct allusion to the documents in question.

Parties
Claimant: Euro-Asian Oil SA; First Defendant: Abilo (UK) Ltd; Second Defendant: Mr Dan Igniska; Third Defendant: Credit Suisse AG
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
Outcome
Application for disclosure refused
Legal Topics
Disclosure, Pleadings, Relevance of Evidence
Civil Procedure Disclosure Pleadings Relevance of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Euro-Asian Oil SA

Claimant

Abilo (UK) Ltd

First Defendant

Mr Dan Igniska

Second Defendant

Credit Suisse AG

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the disclosure sought is relevant to any pleaded issue
  2. 2 Whether CPR 31.14 is engaged for the documents sought

Ratio Decidendi

The disclosure sought is not relevant to any currently pleaded issue, nor is CPR 31.14 engaged as there is no specific mention or direct allusion to the documents in question.

Court Disposition

Application for disclosure refused

Orders

  • Application for disclosure is refused
  • Liberty to apply for further disclosure if pleadings are amended to show relevance