Suez Fortune Investments Ltd & Anor v Talbot Underwriting Ltd

Suez Fortune Investments Ltd & Anor v Talbot Underwriting Ltd

The claimants' applications for extension of time, relief from sanctions, and variation of the unless order are dismissed. The court found the claimants' explanation for non-compliance to be a fabrication, and that they deliberately and contumeliously breached disclosure obligations. There is no basis for relief or variation under the applicable legal principles. The claim remains struck out.

Parties
First Claimant: Suez Fortune Investments Ltd; Second Claimant: Piraeus Bank AE; First Defendant: Talbot Underwriting Ltd; Second Defendant: Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member Ltd; Third Defendant: QBE Corporate Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Chaucer Corporate Capital (No 2.) Ltd; Fifth Defendant: Markel Capital Ltd; Sixth Defendant: Catlin Syndicate Ltd; Seventh Defendant: April Grange Ltd; Eighth Defendant: Brit UW Ltd; Ninth Defendant: Novae Corporate Underwriting Ltd; Tenth Defendant: GAI Indemnity Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim (insurance/disclosure) / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time, Relief From Sanctions, and Variation of Unless Order
Outcome
Applications dismissed; claim remains struck out.
Legal Topics
Disclosure Obligations, Relief From Sanctions, Unless Orders, Fraud Allegations, Marine Insurance, Constructive Total Loss
Civil Procedure Insurance Law Disclosure Obligations Relief From Sanctions Unless Orders Fraud Allegations Marine Insurance Constructive Total Loss

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suez Fortune Investments Ltd

First Claimant

Piraeus Bank AE

Second Claimant

Talbot Underwriting Ltd

First Defendant

Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member Ltd

Second Defendant

QBE Corporate Ltd

Third Defendant

Chaucer Corporate Capital (No 2.) Ltd

Fourth Defendant

Markel Capital Ltd

Fifth Defendant

Catlin Syndicate Ltd

Sixth Defendant

April Grange Ltd

Seventh Defendant

Brit UW Ltd

Eighth Defendant

Novae Corporate Underwriting Ltd

Ninth Defendant

GAI Indemnity Ltd

Tenth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Claim (insurance/disclosure) / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time, Relief From Sanctions, and Variation of Unless Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants should be granted an extension of time to comply with disclosure orders
  2. 2 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for failure to comply with an unless order
  3. 3 Whether the unless order should be varied or revoked under CPR 3.1(7)

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants' applications for extension of time, relief from sanctions, and variation of the unless order are dismissed. The court found the claimants' explanation for non-compliance to be a fabrication, and that they deliberately and contumeliously breached disclosure obligations. There is no basis for relief or variation under the applicable legal principles. The claim remains struck out.

Court Disposition

Applications dismissed; claim remains struck out.

Orders

  • The claimants' applications for extension of time, relief from sanctions, and variation of the unless order are dismissed.
  • The claim remains struck out.