Revenue And Customs v IGE USA Investments Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 1716 (Ch) (31 December 2020)
The court has jurisdiction under paragraph 18 of the Disclosure Pilot Scheme to order disclosure of specific documents relating to an Issue for Disclosure, even if there is no agreed or approved List of Issues for Disclosure, provided there is an existing order for Extended Disclosure and the disclosure sought is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate for the just disposal of the proceedings.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1716 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS; Defendant/appellant: IGE USA INVESTMENTS LIMITED; Defendant/appellant: GE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS; Defendant/appellant: GE CAPITAL FINANCE; Defendant/appellant: GE COMMERCIAL & CONSUMER FINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Defendant/appellant: GE CAPITAL CORPORATION (HOLDINGS); Defendant/appellant: GE (HOLDINGS); Defendant/appellant: INTERNATIONAL GENERAL ELECTRIC (U. S. A.)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of Specific Disclosure Under Disclosure Pilot Scheme
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Pilot Scheme, Specific Disclosure, Extended Disclosure, Jurisdiction, Fraud Allegations, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Claimant/respondent
IGE USA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Defendant/appellant
GE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
Defendant/appellant
GE CAPITAL FINANCE
Defendant/appellant
GE COMMERCIAL & CONSUMER FINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant/appellant
GE CAPITAL CORPORATION (HOLDINGS)
Defendant/appellant
GE (HOLDINGS)
Defendant/appellant
INTERNATIONAL GENERAL ELECTRIC (U. S. A.)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of Specific Disclosure Under Disclosure Pilot Scheme
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction under paragraph 18 of the Disclosure Pilot Scheme (CPR PD51U) to order specific disclosure when there is no agreed or approved List of Issues for Disclosure
- 2 Whether Issues for Disclosure are limited to issues identifiable in the statements of case
- 3 Whether a List of Issues for Disclosure is a prerequisite for an order under paragraph 18
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction under paragraph 18 of the Disclosure Pilot Scheme to order disclosure of specific documents relating to an Issue for Disclosure, even if there is no agreed or approved List of Issues for Disclosure, provided there is an existing order for Extended Disclosure and the disclosure sought is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate for the just disposal of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order for disclosure under paragraph 18 of the Disclosure Pilot Scheme requiring HMRC to provide specific disclosure of the FIS Documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment