First Rate FX Ltd v Trading By Telephone Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 1838 (QB) (16 April 2014)
The first defendant failed to comply with the disclosure and inspection orders, including by providing redacted and incomplete documents, and its defence is struck out. The individual Mishcon defendants and Mr Crisp provided disclosure and inspection in good faith and are not to have their defences struck out. Mr Ward's proceedings are stayed due to likely settlement. The second defendant is ordered to provide specific disclosure of turnover/profit documents and relevant emails by 4pm on 17 April 2014. Time for witness statements and updated schedule of loss is extended to 24 April 2014. The trial window is varied to commence on 6 May 2014.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1838 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: First Rate FX Ltd; First Defendant/applicant: Trading By Telephone Ltd; Second Defendant/applicant: Opt FX Ltd; Third Defendant/applicant: Mr Daniel Crisp; Fourth Defendant/applicant: Mr Scott Gunn; Fifth Defendant/applicant: Mr Oliver Davis-Gardner; Sixth Defendant/applicant: Mr Bobby Ward; Seventh Defendant/applicant: Mr Billy Martin; Eighth Defendant/applicant: Mr Cameron Perry Peter Hassan; Ninth Defendant/applicant: Mr Louis Lavers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation (high Court, Queen's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Compliance With Disclosure Orders and Case Management Directions
- Outcome
- Partially allowed; first defendant's defence struck out; specific disclosure ordered; proceedings against Mr Ward stayed; case management directions varied.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure and Inspection of Documents, Restrictive Covenants, Case Management, Unless Orders, Striking Out Defences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
First Rate FX Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Trading By Telephone Ltd
First Defendant/applicant
Opt FX Ltd
Second Defendant/applicant
Mr Daniel Crisp
Third Defendant/applicant
Mr Scott Gunn
Fourth Defendant/applicant
Mr Oliver Davis-Gardner
Fifth Defendant/applicant
Mr Bobby Ward
Sixth Defendant/applicant
Mr Billy Martin
Seventh Defendant/applicant
Mr Cameron Perry Peter Hassan
Eighth Defendant/applicant
Mr Louis Lavers
Ninth Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation (high Court, Queen's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Compliance With Disclosure Orders and Case Management Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants complied with disclosure and inspection orders
- 2 Whether defences should be struck out for non-compliance with unless orders
- 3 Whether further specific disclosure should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The first defendant failed to comply with the disclosure and inspection orders, including by providing redacted and incomplete documents, and its defence is struck out. The individual Mishcon defendants and Mr Crisp provided disclosure and inspection in good faith and are not to have their defences struck out. Mr Ward's proceedings are stayed due to likely settlement. The second defendant is ordered to provide specific disclosure of turnover/profit documents and relevant emails by 4pm on 17 April 2014. Time for witness statements and updated schedule of loss is extended to 24 April 2014. The trial window is varied to commence on 6 May 2014.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed; first defendant's defence struck out; specific disclosure ordered; proceedings against Mr Ward stayed; case management directions varied.
Orders
- Defence of Trading By Telephone Ltd (first defendant) struck out for failure to comply with disclosure orders.
- Second defendant (Opt FX Ltd) to provide specific disclosure of turnover/profit documents and relevant emails by 4pm on 17 April 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment