IPJSC United Company Rusal v Whiteleave Holdings Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 154 (Comm) (30 January 2026)
Mr. Potanin, as CEO of NN, has legal control over NN's documents under Russian law for the purposes of disclosure in these proceedings, subject to his duties to act in the company's interests and to Russian confidentiality rules. The existence of confidentiality or other restrictions does not preclude a disclosure order in principle; any specific issues can be addressed by consent, redaction, or further directions. The fact that some documents may not be disclosable does not prevent an order requiring a search for and disclosure of those documents which are within his control.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 154 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: IPJSC United Company Rusal; First Defendant: Whiteleave Holdings Limited; Second Defendant: Vladimir Olegovich Potanin; Third Defendant: Crispian Investments Limited; Fourth Defendant: Roman Arkadievich Abramovich
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Proceedings (disclosure Application) / Third Case Management Conference (cmc 3), Interlocutory Judgment on Disclosure
- Outcome
- Disclosure order granted in principle against Mr. Potanin for documents held by NN and its subsidiaries, subject to exceptions and further directions.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Obligations, Control of Documents, Foreign Law in English Proceedings, Directors' Duties, Confidentiality and Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IPJSC United Company Rusal
Claimant
Whiteleave Holdings Limited
First Defendant
Vladimir Olegovich Potanin
Second Defendant
Crispian Investments Limited
Third Defendant
Roman Arkadievich Abramovich
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings (disclosure Application) / Third Case Management Conference (cmc 3), Interlocutory Judgment on Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Potanin, as CEO of NN, has legal or practical control over documents held by NN and its subsidiaries for the purposes of disclosure under PD 57AD
- 2 Whether Russian law or internal company regulations restrict Mr. Potanin's right to access and disclose such documents in English proceedings
- 3 Whether the existence of Russian confidentiality rules or other restrictions precludes a disclosure order against Mr. Potanin
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Potanin, as CEO of NN, has legal control over NN's documents under Russian law for the purposes of disclosure in these proceedings, subject to his duties to act in the company's interests and to Russian confidentiality rules. The existence of confidentiality or other restrictions does not preclude a disclosure order in principle; any specific issues can be addressed by consent, redaction, or further directions. The fact that some documents may not be disclosable does not prevent an order requiring a search for and disclosure of those documents which are within his control.
Court Disposition
Disclosure order granted in principle against Mr. Potanin for documents held by NN and its subsidiaries, subject to exceptions and further directions.
Orders
- Mr. Potanin is ordered to search for and disclose documents held by NN and identified subsidiaries within his control, subject to Russian confidentiality rules and company interests.
- Any specific issues regarding confidentiality or inability to disclose to be addressed by consent, redaction, or further application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment