Marlwood Commercial Inc v Kozeny [2004] EWCA Civ 798 (25 June 2004)

Marlwood Commercial Inc v Kozeny [2004] EWCA Civ 798 (25 June 2004)

In the absence of special circumstances or injustice, the public interest in the investigation of serious or complex fraud, as reflected in the 1987 and 1990 Acts, outweighs the general concern to restrict collateral use of disclosed documents under CPR 31.22, even where the documents have been brought into the jurisdiction by a foreign litigant. The court should grant permission for such use and compliance with SFO notices is not excused merely because the documents originated abroad.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Civ 798
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Marlwood Commercial Inc; Defendant/appellant: Viktor Kozeny; Intervener: Director of the Serious Fraud Office
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Documents, Public Interest Immunity, International Judicial Assistance, Collateral Use of Disclosed Documents
Civil Procedure International Cooperation Fraud Disclosure of Documents Public Interest Immunity International Judicial Assistance Collateral Use of Disclosed Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marlwood Commercial Inc

Claimant/respondent

Viktor Kozeny

Defendant/appellant

Director of the Serious Fraud Office

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the public interest in the investigation of serious fraud and international cooperation overrides the public interest in restricting collateral use of disclosed documents in civil litigation under CPR 31.22.
  2. 2 Whether foreign litigants whose documents are brought into the jurisdiction for disclosure are entitled to greater protection against collateral use for foreign criminal investigations.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of special circumstances or injustice, the public interest in the investigation of serious or complex fraud, as reflected in the 1987 and 1990 Acts, outweighs the general concern to restrict collateral use of disclosed documents under CPR 31.22, even where the documents have been brought into the jurisdiction by a foreign litigant. The court should grant permission for such use and compliance with SFO notices is not excused merely because the documents originated abroad.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal to the House of Lords refused
  • Stay of execution continued until 4:00pm on 23 July 2004, or until determination of any petition for leave to appeal to the House of Lords