Barings Plc & Ors v Co Lybrand & Ors [2000] EWCA Civ 148 (5 May 2000)
The transcripts were obtained under or for the purposes of the Banking Act 1987 and are subject to the statutory restriction on disclosure in s.82(1). However, if and to the extent that the transcripts were made available to the public in the course of court proceedings, the restriction is lost. The burden is on the party contesting public availability to show the documents did not enter the public domain.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 148
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Deloitte & Touche; Claimant: Barings PLC (in liquidation); Intervener: Financial Services Authority (FSA)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Mr Justice Evans Lombe Dated 15 December 1999
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed on the first issue, allowed on the second issue.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Information, Banking Act 1987 S.82, Public Domain in Litigation, Professional Negligence, Court Document Inspection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deloitte & Touche
Appellant/defendant
Barings PLC (in liquidation)
Claimant
Financial Services Authority (FSA)
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Mr Justice Evans Lombe Dated 15 December 1999
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether transcripts of interviews from the BoBS investigation into Barings' collapse are subject to the disclosure restriction in Part V of the Banking Act 1987
- 2 Whether those transcripts had been made available to the public and thus ceased to be restricted under s.82(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The transcripts were obtained under or for the purposes of the Banking Act 1987 and are subject to the statutory restriction on disclosure in s.82(1). However, if and to the extent that the transcripts were made available to the public in the course of court proceedings, the restriction is lost. The burden is on the party contesting public availability to show the documents did not enter the public domain.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed on the first issue, allowed on the second issue.
Orders
- Order as agreed between counsel, no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment