FL v Registrar General

FL v Registrar General

The applicant's circumstances, while subjectively compelling, do not amount to 'exceptional circumstances' as required by section 79(4) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002. The statutory language is clear and Parliament intentionally excluded descendants from the definition of birth relatives. The court cannot rewrite the statute or lower the threshold for exceptionality. There is no breach of Article 8 ECHR as the interference is proportionate and justified by the public interest in maintaining confidentiality of adoption records.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: FKL; Defendant/appellant: Registrar General
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Family/adoption / Judgment on Application for Disclosure Under Section 79(4) Adoption and Children Act 2002
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Adoption Records, Exceptional Circumstances Test, Article 8 ECHR, Statutory Interpretation
Family Law Adoption Law Human Rights Disclosure of Adoption Records Exceptional Circumstances Test Article 8 ECHR Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FKL

Claimant/respondent

Registrar General

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Family/adoption / Judgment on Application for Disclosure Under Section 79(4) Adoption and Children Act 2002

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant, as a descendant of an adopted person, is entitled to disclosure of adoption information under section 79(4) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances of the applicant are 'exceptional' within the meaning of the statute
  3. 3 Whether refusal to disclose breaches Article 8 ECHR

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's circumstances, while subjectively compelling, do not amount to 'exceptional circumstances' as required by section 79(4) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002. The statutory language is clear and Parliament intentionally excluded descendants from the definition of birth relatives. The court cannot rewrite the statute or lower the threshold for exceptionality. There is no breach of Article 8 ECHR as the interference is proportionate and justified by the public interest in maintaining confidentiality of adoption records.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order for disclosure of adoption information under section 79(4) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002