RK, R (on the application of) v South Yorkshire Police & Anor
The South Yorkshire Police failed to properly assess proportionality in disclosing allegations for which the claimant was acquitted, did not give adequate reasons, relied on irrelevant material, and failed to consider relevant representations. The disclosure decision was fundamentally flawed and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: RK; First Defendant: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police; Second Defendant: Disclosure and Banning Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
- Outcome
- Application allowed; disclosure decision quashed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Criminal Records, Proportionality, Article 8 ECHR, Judicial Review, Police Powers, Bias
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RK
Claimant
Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
First Defendant
Disclosure and Banning Service
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the South Yorkshire Police adopted a proper approach to proportionality in disclosing allegations in an Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate (ECRC)
- 2 Whether there was a failure to give adequate reasons for the disclosure decision
- 3 Whether there was reliance on irrelevant material or failure to consider relevant material
Ratio Decidendi
The South Yorkshire Police failed to properly assess proportionality in disclosing allegations for which the claimant was acquitted, did not give adequate reasons, relied on irrelevant material, and failed to consider relevant representations. The disclosure decision was fundamentally flawed and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; disclosure decision quashed
Orders
- The decision to disclose the ECRC is quashed.
- South Yorkshire Police to reconsider the decision within eight weeks using different officers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment