Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor

Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor

The Claimant's disclosure was deficient in certain respects, particularly regarding audio recordings, documents from US divorce proceedings, and medical records. The court ordered further disclosure in these categories, limited to documents within the Claimant's control and relevant under CPR r.31.6. The court declined to order further disclosure of certain text messages and documents from the US defamation proceedings unless the Defendants obtained consent from the producing party. No costs sanction was imposed at this stage; costs to be determined at trial.

Parties
Claimant: John Christopher Depp II; 1st Defendant: News Group Newspapers Ltd; 2nd Defendant: Dan Wootton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation (libel) / Pre Trial Review; Ruling on Specific Disclosure Application
Outcome
Defendants' application for specific disclosure partially allowed; further disclosure ordered in certain categories; no costs order at this stage.
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Documents, Standard Disclosure, Control of Documents, Proportionality in Disclosure, Medical Records Disclosure, Privilege and Confidentiality, International Proceedings Impact
Defamation Civil Procedure Disclosure of Documents Standard Disclosure Control of Documents Proportionality in Disclosure Medical Records Disclosure Privilege and Confidentiality +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Christopher Depp II

Claimant

News Group Newspapers Ltd

1st Defendant

Dan Wootton

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Defamation (libel) / Pre Trial Review; Ruling on Specific Disclosure Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant has complied with disclosure obligations under CPR r.31.6 and related rules
  2. 2 Whether further disclosure should be ordered regarding audio recordings, text messages, documents from US divorce and defamation proceedings, and medical records
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant's disclosure failures warrant costs sanctions

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant's disclosure was deficient in certain respects, particularly regarding audio recordings, documents from US divorce proceedings, and medical records. The court ordered further disclosure in these categories, limited to documents within the Claimant's control and relevant under CPR r.31.6. The court declined to order further disclosure of certain text messages and documents from the US defamation proceedings unless the Defendants obtained consent from the producing party. No costs sanction was imposed at this stage; costs to be determined at trial.

Court Disposition

Defendants' application for specific disclosure partially allowed; further disclosure ordered in certain categories; no costs order at this stage.

Orders

  • Claimant to make further disclosure of audio recordings relevant to the issues, limited to those within his control and as required by CPR r.31.6.
  • Claimant to make further disclosure of documents from US divorce proceedings within his control.