NCC v AH & Anor [2014] EWHC 4845 (Fam) (19 August 2014)

NCC v AH & Anor [2014] EWHC 4845 (Fam) (19 August 2014)

There is no basis for ordering disclosure of the reports or social services records after the conclusion of proceedings, as disclosure is only required to ensure a fair trial within ongoing proceedings. No collateral purpose justifies disclosure. There is no evidence of any agreement by NCC to pay AH's or DH's costs, and no conduct by NCC justifies departing from the general rule of no order as to costs.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 4845 (Fam)
Parties
Applicant/claimant: NCC; First Respondent/defendant: AH; Second Respondent/defendant: DH; Litigation Friend for Ah/interested Party: Official Solicitor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 August 2014
Procedural Posture
Family/inherent Jurisdiction and Court of Protection / Post Substantive Determination; Applications for Disclosure and Costs
Outcome
Applications for disclosure dismissed; no order as to costs; order preventing Official Solicitor from disclosing documents to AH.
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Expert Reports, Costs in Court of Protection, Confidentiality of Court Documents, Collateral Use of Evidence
Family Law Mental Capacity Law Court of Protection Disclosure of Expert Reports Costs in Court of Protection Confidentiality of Court Documents Collateral Use of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NCC

Applicant/claimant

AH

First Respondent/defendant

DH

Second Respondent/defendant

Official Solicitor

Litigation Friend for Ah/interested Party

Procedural Posture

Family/inherent Jurisdiction and Court of Protection / Post Substantive Determination; Applications for Disclosure and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether disclosure of expert reports and social services records should be ordered after conclusion of proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the local authority should be ordered to pay the costs of AH and DH

Ratio Decidendi

There is no basis for ordering disclosure of the reports or social services records after the conclusion of proceedings, as disclosure is only required to ensure a fair trial within ongoing proceedings. No collateral purpose justifies disclosure. There is no evidence of any agreement by NCC to pay AH's or DH's costs, and no conduct by NCC justifies departing from the general rule of no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Applications for disclosure dismissed; no order as to costs; order preventing Official Solicitor from disclosing documents to AH.

Orders

  • Applications for disclosure by DH and AH dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.