Harcourt v FEF Griffin & Ors [2007] EWHC 1500 (QB) (27 June 2007)

Disclosure of insurance details is ordered because there is a real basis for concern that a realistic award may not be satisfied, and such information is necessary for the claimant and court to make informed decisions regarding periodical payments and lump sum awards.

Citation: [2007] EWHC 1500
Parties: Claimant: Josh Harcourt; First Defendant: Fef Griffin (Representative of Pegasus Gymnastics Club); Second Defendant: Ovidiu Rugina; Third Defendant: Iqnut Trandaburu
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 27 June 2007
Procedural Posture: Personal Injury / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure of Insurance Details
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Disclosure of Insurance Details, Periodical Payments, Damages Assessment, Civil Procedure Rules Part 18

Civil Procedure Personal Injury Disclosure of Insurance Details Periodical Payments Damages Assessment Civil Procedure Rules Part 18

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9

Parties

Josh Harcourt

Claimant

Fef Griffin (Representative of Pegasus Gymnastics Club)

First Defendant

Ovidiu Rugina

Second Defendant

Iqnut Trandaburu

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure of Insurance Details

Legal Issues

1 Whether the court should order disclosure of the defendants' insurance details under CPR Part 18
2 Whether such disclosure is necessary for the claimant and court to assess periodical payments versus lump sum awards

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Defendants to reply to the Part 18 request for information, as served and in full.